Ungated3/8
SECTION 3 OF 8

The other side of the gate

The fund manager's hurt locker

6 pain points mirror the investor's gates exactly. The fund manager can't let you in for the same reasons you can't get in. Same wall, opposite sides.
4 SECTIONS
You built a strategy the world needs. The infrastructure won't let you deliver it. You're a fund manager. You've spent years building a quantitative strategy that returns 40% a year with a 5% max drawdown. Your edge is real. Your track record is real. And you can't reach the people who need you.
1/4
1

Onboarding cost

You want to accept a new allocator. Here's what that costs. Compliance review: 3-5 days. Fund admin setup: 1-2 weeks. Wire reconciliation: days of emails because the bank deducted a $25 fee and the amount doesn't match. Total cost to onboard one allocator: $5,000-$10,000 in hard costs. Two to six weeks in elapsed time. This is why your minimum is $500K. Not because the strategy needs it. Because the plumbing does.
95
Would this be different in 1995?
The costs were higher. The minimums were higher. But the ratio is the same: infrastructure tax per allocator determines who you can afford to accept.
2/4
2

Distribution

You're a $50M fund. You're not Goldman Sachs. You don't have a private wealth division or a cap intro team. Your distribution strategy is: people who already know you. That's it. Your track record is exceptional. Your ability to put that track record in front of people who need it is zero.
Would this be different in 1995?
You are a restaurant with the best food in the city, on a street with no signs, in a building with no door.
3/4
3

Reporting burden

Every month, you produce a report. NAV calculation, performance attribution, fee reconciliation, investor statements. The report goes out as a PDF. To every allocator individually. You spend three to five days a month on reporting. Three to five days you're not improving your model, not researching new signals, not doing the one thing your allocators actually pay you to do. The infrastructure tax isn't just money. It's your time. And for a fund manager, time is literally alpha.
Would this be different in 1995?
The report would have gone by post. Everything else is identical.
4/4
4

Credibility

You know your returns are real. You traded them. You can show the execution logs, the exchange records, the daily P&L. But your allocator doesn't see any of that. They see a PDF. Produced by you. Confirmed by an administrator who got the numbers from you. The entire trust chain is circular. The irony: you want independent verification. Because every fund that faked their numbers makes your legitimate returns harder to sell.
'95
Would this be different in 1995?
Your returns are your strongest asset. The infrastructure makes them your weakest pitch.
Now flip the camera one more time. You're a wealth advisor. 80 clients, 3 strategies each: 240 onboarding processes. 240 PDFs. 240 reconciliations. You became an advisor to help people. The infrastructure turned you into a clerk.
The allocator can't get in. The fund manager can't let them in. The advisor can't scale access. The treasurer can't deploy reserves. Every participant in the system is trapped by the same infrastructure failure, just from different sides of the wall. So the problem is clear. Both sides feel it. The question is whether anyone has built a better way.
END OF SECTION 3
$10K to onboard one person. Fund managers are trapped too.
PREVIOUS
The gate
NEXT
The fix?

MakeBanc is a technology platform that connects capital owners with independent strategy operators. MakeBanc does not provide investment advice, custody services, or banking services.

© 2026 MB Technology Ltd, Cayman Islands.